Friday, October 26, 2007

பய பீதியில் மோடியும், ஜெயலலிதாவும் - பாசிசம்=கோழைத்தனம்!

பாசிஸ்டுகளின் இயல்பே உண்மையை கண்டால் பயந்து அஞ்சி ஓடி ஒளிந்து கொள்வதுதான். பாருங்களேன் October 2004 ல் ஒரு பாசிஸ்டை ஒரு பொது மேடையில் நிறுத்தி உண்மைகளை கேட்ட பொழுது அது அஞ்சி நடுங்கி மேடையிலிருந்து பயந்து ஓடியது. இ஧தா அதே Octoberல் 2007ல் இன்னொரு பாசிஸ்டை வேறொரு மேடையில் நிறுத்தி உண்மைகளை கேட்ட பொழுதும் அஞ்சி நடுங்கி நா வறண்டு தண்ணீர் தாகமெடுக்க பதறி ஓடியுள்ளது.

இங்கு தமிழ்மணத்திலும், வேறு பல்வேறு இடங்களிலும், சம்பவங்களிலும் கூட பாசிஸ்டுகளின் முன்னால் மறுக்க இயலா உண்மைகளை வைத்த போதெல்லாம் பின்னங்கால் பிடறியில் அடிக்க ஓடி ஒளிந்ததை பார்த்த அனுபவம் நம்மில் பலருக்கு இருந்திருக்கும். இவர்கள் அனைவருமே பார்ப்பன பயங்கரவாத பாசிஸ்டுகள்.

அந்த அக்டோபர் சம்பவங்களை கீழே பார்ப்போம்.


October 2007-ல் ஒரு பார்ப்பன பயங்கரவாத பாசிஸ்டு - மோடி:

CNN IBN சேனலில் Devilஒs Advocate என்ற நிகழ்ச்சியில்(கலைஞர் கருணாநிதி இவருக்கு முன்பாக இதில் தோன்றியவர். அவர் அஞ்சி நடுங்கி ஓடி விடவில்லை) மோடியை கரன் தப்பார் என்பவர் பேட்டியெடுத்தார். பாசிஸ்டு மோடியிடம் கேட்க்கப்பட்டதெல்லாம் உண்மைகள் குறித்த ரொம்ப ரொம்ப சாதாரணமான கேள்விகள் மட்டுமே. அதற்க்கு பதிலளிக்க பயந்த அந்த கோழை பின்வருமாறு கூறி ஓடி விட்டான். அவர்களிடம் கேட்க்க தகுந்த நியாயமான கேள்விகளை கேட்டால் நெஞ்சு வெடித்து மேடையிலேயே மரணித்துவிடுவார்கள் போல...


KT: Can I point out to you that in September 2003 the Supreme Court said that they had lost faith in the Gujarat government? In April 2004 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court said that you were like a modern day Nero who looks the other side when helpless children and innocent women were being burnt. The Supreme Court seems to have a problem with you.

Modi: I have a small request to make. Please go through the SC judgment. If there is anything in writing, I ll be happy to know everything.


KT: There was nothing in writing. You are right. It was an observation.

Modi: If it is in the judgment then Ill be happy to give you the answer.


KT: But do you mean a criticism by the Chief Justice in court doesnt matter?

Modi: Its a simple request. Please go through the court judgment. Hand out the sentence you are quoting and let the people know it.

KT: Ok. In August 2004 the Supreme Court reopened some 2,100 cases out of a total of around 4600 almost 40 per cent, and they did so because they believed that justice hadnt happened in Gujarat.

Modi: Ill be happy. Ultimately the court of law will take the judgment.


KT: Ill tell you what the problem is. Even five years after the Gujarat killings of 2002, the ghost of Godhra still haunts you. Why have you not done more to allay that ghost?

Modi: This I give it to the mediapersons like Karan Thapar. Let them enjoy.


KT: Can I suggest something to you?

Modi: I have no problem.


KT: Why cant you say that you regret the killings that happened? Why cant you say that may be the government should have done more to protect Muslims?

Modi: What I had to say I have said at that time, and you can find out my statements.


KT: Just say it again.

Modi: Not necessary that I have to talk about, in 2007, everything you want to talk about.


KT: But by not saying it again, by not letting people hear the message repeatedly you are allowing an image contrary to the interest of Gujarat to continue. Its in your hands to change it.

(Modi takes mike off)

Modi: Ill have to rest. I need some water.

Paani (water).

Modi: Dosti bani rahe bas (Friendship should be maintained, thatஒs all). Iஒll be happy. You came here. I am happy and thankful to you. I cant do this interview. Itஒs ok your things are. Apne ideas hain aap bolte rahiye aap karte rahiye (These are your ideas, you keep talking, keep doing). 3-4 questions Ive already enjoyed. Nahin please.


KT: But Modi saab...

Modi: Nahin, please Karan.


KT: But Modi saab.

Modi: Karan dekho main dostana sambhand rakhna chahta hoon, aap usko koshish kariye (Karan, I want to maintain friendly relations. You make efforts towards that).


KT: Mujhe ek cheez samjhayee sir. I am not talking about doing anything wrong. I am saying why cant you correct your image?

Modi: This is not the time. Uske liye aap mujhe 2002 mein mile hote, 2003 mein mile hote mein sab kar leta (for that, you should have met me in 2002, you should have met me in 2003, I would have done all that).



Thanks: The Hindu



தேசிய நாயகன் மோடி தேசிய காமெடியனாக மாறியதற்க்கு அவனது பாசிஸ இயல்பு தவிர வேறொன்றும் காரணமில்லை. உலகப் புகழ்பெற்ற பாசிஸ்டு ஹிட்லர் அவன் ஹீரோவாக இருந்த காலத்திலேயே காமெடியனாக சித்தரிக்க (The Great Dictator) முடிந்ததற்க்கு சார்லி சாப்ளினின் திறமை மட்டும் காரணமல்ல. அவன்(ஹிட்லர்) பாசிஸ்டு என்பதும் சேர்ந்துதான் அங்கே காமெடிக்கு வலு சேர்க்கிறது. பாசிஸ்டுகள் கோழைகளாக இருப்பது இயங்கியலின் விதி. பயப் பீதியில் இருக்கும் முதலாளித்துவத்தின் கடைசிப் புகலிடம் பாசிசம். அதன஡ல் கோழைத்தனம் என்பது அதன் அடிப்படை இயல்பு.

October 2004-ல் ஒரு பார்ப்பன பயங்கரவாத பாசிஸ்டு - ஜெயலலிதா:

இதே போல அக்டோ பர் 2004ல் ஜெயலலிதா என்ற பாசிஸ்டை மேடையில் உட்கார வைத்து சில சாதாரண கேள்விகள் கேட்டதற்க்கு அது பின்வருமாறு பதில் சொல்லி ஓடி விட்டது.
(http://www.bbc.co.uk/tamil/highlights/story/2004/09/040930_jayainterview.shtml)


KT: Except for the fact that many people felt, not just the press this time, but the court was actually saying that legally you were innocent but morally you had a case to answer at least to yourself personally.

JJ: I told you I do not comment on any judgment of the Supreme Court, whether the judgment involves me personally or any other matter of public importance. I never have commented on any judgment of the Supreme Court, I will not do so.


KT: You are a very tough person, Chief Minister.

JJ: People like you have made me so.

KT: You said that you were misunderstood.

JJ: Yes.

KT: Do you think that you are badly treated by the press?

JJ: I do not wish to say anything more on this. Anyway your interview is not doing anything to help matters.

KT: My aim, Chief Minister, was to get to the core of the misunderstanding. You said that the press.

JJ: Your aim seems to have been to put as many unpleasant questions as possible and try to provoke me.

KT: Not to provoke you but to put to you the questions that have been discussed for the last three years and which in many ways may be responsible for the electoral adversityஸ

JJ: Havent you asked all of your questions? Have you got anything more to ask?

KT: I have come very close to the end of this interview, I have only one last question. Are you
confident that you can see your electoral low point over with, and that you will win in 2006?

JJ: Wait and see. I told you already I dont believe in astrology. I cant predict what will happen in the next elections but you will be around I suppose. Wait and see what happens.

KT: Is that a yes, you will win?

JJ: I said wait and see.

KT: Chief Minister, a pleasure talking to you on HARDtalk India.

JJ: I must say it wasnt a pleasure talking to you. Namaste

சாதாரண கேள்விகள் கேட்டால் அது இவர்களை தூண்டிவிடுகிறதாம். இவர்கள் சொல்லும் பொய்களை நம்பும் வெறியேற்றப்பட்ட கூட்டங்களில் பேசி பழகி விட்டார்கள் அல்லவா அதனால்தான் வித்தியாசமாக ஓரளவு சொந்த புத்தியுள்ளவர்கள் மத்தியில் பேசுவதற்க்கு இவர்களால் இயலவில்லை. இப்படி பீதி கொண்டு பயந்து ஓடுவதற்க்கு ஒரு சொறிநாயாக பிறந்திருக்கலாம். அல்லது ஒரு பன்றியாய் பிறந்து மலத்தை தின்று உயிர் வாழ்ந்திருக்கலாம். மானங்கெட்ட பொழப்பு.

அரசு இயந்திரத்தின் பலத்தில் நின்று கொண்டு அடாத ஆட்டம் ஆடும் இது போன்ற பாசிஸ்டுகளை வீதிகளில் சந்தித்து கேள்விகளாலேயே கொன்று விடலாம். அவ்வளவுதான் இவர்கள். ஒரு கரப்பான் பூச்சியை ஒத்ததோரு வாழ்க்கை, மன இயல்பு.

TerrorinFocus

Related Article:

கரண் தாப்பரிடம் இருந்து தப்பியோடிய மோடி: சீழ்ப் பிடித்து நாறும் இந்துத்துவ முகம்

Thursday, October 11, 2007

Rama.... Rama....

There is a malicious mail circulating with Big lies about Ramayana and the Sand Bridge of PALK Straight. We would like to confront the foolish belief behind the story with some simple questions.

#1) could somebody ask those forwarding the mail to tell what was there in the Ocean some 17 lakh years before?

There was no ocean at all between Tamilnadu and Srilanka even some 10000 years before. Srilanka and India were connected by land and later the sea submerged the land. And as per the NASA the sand structure is naturally made not man made.


#2) Why Rama has built a bridge when it was well connected by land at that time?

Is he a Fool?


#3) why did he build an 800 Miles length bridge to cover just 18 miles distance?(as per Valmiki Ramayanam)

Is it not ridiculous? May be he started building it from Hyderabad
or may be he built it to reach Andaman Island, Sure it is not
towards Srilanka.

#4) If he really built a bridge for crossing PALK Straight, then he must have built so many bridges to cross Mahanadhi, godhavari, krishna, Penna, Palar, Cauvery.. (Crossing his route towards Rameshvaram…) Where are they now? If somebody says they have been
destroyed…then how Rama could be claimed as a god?


#5) Is really Ramayanam happened some 17 Lakh years before?

The known history of Civilization dates backs to only 7000 to 5000 years. If we have to believe the below story, that is 17 lakhs years before Rama has build a bridge and waged War. Then we could comfortably conclude it is Rama himself a half Monkey that is he never belongs to a civilized society… and they are nude too… It is even ridiculous to know Rama and Seeta crossed the Land using a stupid idea called an over-bridge without Wearing dress.

There are many references against Buddhism appear in Valmiki’s Ramayana. So do we conclude Buddhism also 17 Lakhs years old?

The present form (Valmiki) of Ramayana is no more than 2000 years old. And Rama as a character can never exists before 5000 years.

Those who destructed Babri Masjid told that Rama was there during 700BC, but now suddenly it become 17.5 lakhs years ago. I don’t understand this sudden swift. May be tomorrow they will come and say that our Toilet was once used by Rama some 50 years before.

Because it is all in Belief, Correct??? it is holy if it is belief. It doesn’t matter even if it kills human. It is bullshit, actually… Or Holyshit for somebody...

#6) when Rama and Lakshman fell unconscious Hanuman brought a big Medicinal Mountain to Lanka. The pieces of the mountain fell all over India and it was also fallen in Kanyakumari which is known as Maaruththumalai.

Is it not ridiculous to go via Kanyakumari when the route to Srilanka located somewhere (North to Ramnad) away from there?

May be tomorrow any projects come in that mountain the Saffron Monkey group would say the mountain is holy.

#7) How come Rama’s bridge was floating then and now it is
submerged?


#8) is it possible to follow the customs of Ramayana in today’s life?

Laxmanan cut Soorpanagai’s (an Aboriginal Girl) nose and breast because a Suthra girl proposed her love to a Kshatriya Man. If we have to follow Ramayana customs today then we have to give the same punishment to one Woman. Her name is Umabharathi, who is a Suthra girl proposed Brahman Man Govindacharya. (http://www.tribuneindia.com/2000/20001010/nation.htm#10)


#9) if somebody believes that Ramayan is an historical event, we can compare other kings with king RAM.

Karikalan’s achievement is kallanai.

Alexander – Greek impact to all civilizations thro his
invasion.

RajaRajan’s achievement is Big Temple.

King Ashoka’s achievement – Saranath stupi, preaching
Buddhism across the world.

Agbar’s achievement – modern revenue department

Rama just lost his wife, fought for her chastity and did nothing to people, where as the great kings of our past did lots of good things to the people.

Rama’s achievements (Crimes) include:

· Suspected his Wife Seedha and insulted her in front of everybody with ugliest words we could find in dictionaries. He asked her to prove her chastity. (It is the first SATI case). He even suspected Lakshman, Bharadhan, and Hanuman etc.

· Killed Sampookan only because he is a Suthra, who tried to worship god directly, which is against Brahmanism.

· Killed many innocents (tribal people) only because they are against Varnasrama dharma and only because they are against their land being used for Brahmanic rituals.

· Lakshman killed Dadagai’s son. Raman solace Lakshman that he killed a Suthra so no need to worry.

· Before building the bridge he destroyed a Village at the request of Sea king, because untouchable (Panjamas) people of the village have used a common Well in that village.

· Rama himself and by other characters been projected as a Diehard protector of Varnasrama Dharma. The whole text of Valmiki Ramayana is a proof for this. And Ramayana is the literary symbol of re-establishment of the caste society. All other personal characters of him are common to any praised historic beings.

· Killed Vali and Dadagai in a most cowardly manner.

· Lakshman cruelly cut Soorpanagai’s nose and breast when she
expressed her love. It is definitely inhuman act.

· He insulted and chafed old woman kooni. This is surely not a Noble character to embrace.


We cannot consider one as a God only because he is good for his friends, brothers and he is loyal to his father. And when he is anti people, Anti women and pro caste, Pro Sati society, we should actually cast him away from our Society. Rama actually deserves this and that is one of the ways to redeem our old pride of casteless society. He is not a model to be followed.

#10) Rama committed suicide. It is even disgraceful and sure it is not a noble character to embrace.

Rama never felt guilty when he tortured Seeta. But he only bereaved for his brother’s demise and committed suicide. Did he really love his wife? Did he really put faith on his half-in-life, Seeta?

When he was roaming around forest after Seeta was missing, He bereaved with lustful memories of Seeta. He worried about he is missing the pleasures of Seeta and he worried about Seeta changes his love towards Ravana. He even says “if he were in Ayodya he may not worry about Seeta is missing, because there are alternatives for pleasure available.” It is only the pleasure of flesh that defines Seeta to him. That is why didn’t bereave for her. Instead he bereaved for his brother, where true love bond them. Is this a right attitude to follow in today’s society?

#11) as per a famous folklore version of Ramayana, Lakshman’s wife
Urmila died during her long-sleep. Urmila went into a trance and fell unconscious when Laxman was serving his brother Rama in the forest. When Lakshman came back to Ayodya he searched for his wife and found only her Skeleton remains in her bed. Lakshman’s concern about his wife was mentioned nowhere in the Ramayana. Like his brother Rama, Lakshman also considered his wife just as an object.

Last but not the least question: Those who are protesting against breaking the Sand Bridge are the ones who gave rebirth to this project (During the BJP government this project again came in to picture. Before BJP it is the British rulers who thought about this project). Why did they do that? When they rule, is Rama not a God to them? When they rule, is Ramayana not a true story to them?

“paritranaya sadhunam

vinasaya ca duskrtam

dharma-samsthapanarthaya

sambhavami yuge yuge”

“Whenever Adharma rules the world I will born and annihilate

Is Rama a God?

Rama born to annihilate the casteless society and to reestablish the Varnasrama caste society, That is to say he born to reestablish the Dharma of Brahmanism. We will reject this anti people demon called Rama and strive for the reestablishment of Adharma – ie, casteless society.

Please pass this to those whom you have forwarded the below message (the below is a conspiracy to gain the public support for an utterly foolish, malicious Claim).


It may not open the Spiritual gate of the World instead it will again and again prove to the world that India is the land of Half naked Snake adorning Fakirs and Fools.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

WE ALL INDIANS KNOW THAT THERE IS VARADI (
Bridge) BETWEEN INDIA
AND SRILANKA WHICH WAS CONSTRUCTED BY " VANARA SENA " IN TRETA
YUGA. BUT NOW NASA PEOPLE FIND IT THAT IT IS THERE AND THEY NAMED IT AS "
ADAM
BRIDGE
".

IS IT CORRECT TO CALL the ancient Bridge WITH THAT new and Alien Name???? THINK
OF IT.


Will
they ever accept if we change the name of the "London Bridge"
as "Laxman Jhoola"?
!!!?

SO, NOW, WE WILL SPREAD THE TRUTH ALL OVER THE WORLD. DO
YOUR CONTRIBUTION, SEND THIS TO EVERYBODY.


NASA SHUTTLE IMAGES
OF A MYSTERIOUS ANCIENT BRIDGE BETWEEN INDIA AND SRILANKA


Courtesy : NASA Digital Image Collection

The recently discovered bridge currently
named as Adam's Bridge made of chain of shoals, c.18 mi (30 km) long, in the Palk
Strait between India and Sri Lanka, reveals a mystery behind it. The bridge's
unique curvature and composition by age reveals that it is man made. The
legends as well as Archeological studies reveal that the first signs of human
inhabitants in Sri Lanka date back to the a primitive age, about 17,50,000
years ago and the bridge's age is also almost equivalent. This information is a
crucial aspect for an insight into the mysterious legend called Ramayana, which
was supposed to have taken place in tretha yuga (more than 17,00,000 years
ago). In this epic, there is a mentioning about a bridge, which was built
between Rameshwaram (India)
and Srilankan coast under the supervision of a dynamic and invincible figure
called Rama who is supposed to be the incarnation of the supreme. This
information may not be of much importance ! t o the archeologist s who are
interested in exploring the origins of man, but it is sure to open the
spiritual gates of the people of the world to have come to know an ancient
history linked to the Indian mythology.



SO , NOW , WE WILL SPREAD THE TRUTH ALL OVER THE WORLD.
DO YOUR CONTRIBUTION, SEND THIS TO EVERYB

(Courtesy: My mail Box)